Received: from BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.150) by BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.318.15 via Mailbox Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:20:18 +0000 Received: from CO2PR03CA0018.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.194.145) by BY2PR0301MB0696.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.318.15; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:20:15 +0000 Received: from BL2FFO11FD005.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c09::151) by CO2PR03CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:1414::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.331.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:20:14 +0000 Received: from mx0b-00105401.pphosted.com (67.231.152.184) by BL2FFO11FD005.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.325.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:20:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0074334.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0074334.ppops.net (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id tACMG1xi043662 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:13 -0500 Received: from xnwpv32.utc.com (xnwpv32.utc.com [159.82.148.212]) by m0074334.ppops.net with ESMTP id 1y51t2bj86-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (xnwpv32.utc.com [127.0.0.1]) by xnwpv32.utc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id tACMB134025749 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:12 -0500 Received: from uusmna1r.utc.com (uusmna1r.utc.com [159.82.219.64]) by xnwpv32.utc.com with ESMTP id 1y2yhcyqja-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:12 -0500 Received: from UUSNWG02.na.utcmail.com (uusnwg02.na.utcmail.com [159.82.111.50]) by uusmna1r.utc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id tACMKBQL022564 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:11 -0500 Received: from UUSNWG0C.na.utcmail.com (159.82.111.52) by UUSNWG02.na.utcmail.com (159.82.111.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:11 -0500 Received: from UUSNWE1Q.na.utcmail.com ([159.82.111.27]) by UUSNWG0C.na.utcmail.com ([159.82.111.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:11 -0500 From: "Wang, Wenli BIS" To: Simon Goldshmid CC: "Mahoney, Sally BIS" Subject: Blue Sky runoff test at OSC on 11/6/2015 Thread-Topic: Blue Sky runoff test at OSC on 11/6/2015 Thread-Index: AdEdmEoAgS6SjK/wQ5mwsaThxnWVFg== X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:20:10 -0500 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: BL2FFO11FD005.protection.gbl X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: ff84c10b-44ec-414c-65e5-08d2ebaf6fc3 X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0 received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: otis.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FAB9A3DF29CF3D4789B5405D093ED96A2525EF2AUUSNWE1Qnautcma_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_FAB9A3DF29CF3D4789B5405D093ED96A2525EF2AUUSNWE1Qnautcma_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Simon, Thanks for coming to Otis Server Center to conduct Compass Security Integra= tion Runoff test. In general, it was a good test, and I am glad that your = system implemented all features except CIM, with solid performance. The follow summarized the test results: 1. Standard interface testing, include a. Otis DES and local DEC configuration, and passed all test= cases. b. DEC operation mode setup, and passed all test cases. c. PIN code and Audit Record support, and pass the all test = cases except enable/disable Audit record. This is not critical if your sys= tem can enable audit record automatically. d. Special feature settings (TD bits), and passed all test ca= ses. Note: special features associated with TD Bits are configurable from = Elevator system. For example, TD08 =3D vertigo by default, but it could be= configured as different TD bit. e. Multiple server group support =96 passed all test cases. f. DER and global DECs =96 configuration of DER is not expl= icitly from UI, but automatically when configure global DECs. This is ok w= hen DER servers use the default IP addresses of 10 and 20 (most cases). Ho= wever, there are some special cases when DER servers will use different IP = addresses, such as 30 & 40. g. System recovery from communication error =96 passed. h. System recovery from compass server failover =96 passed. i. The following interface/features were not tested: i. V1 i= nterface =96 not support. ii. CIM s= egment=96 not support. 2. Card data handling for ICD v3 support. a. Receive and process security card data from Otis reader = =96 passed. We tested with a standard 26 bit HID Prox card. 3. Tested the system with both Otis internal readers and BluB0x ex= ternal readers on one compass system =96 passed. Please feel free to provide your input/feedback. Thanks, Wenli Wang Software Engineering Group Otis Service Center 212 West Newberry Road, Bloomfield CT 06002 Phone 860.286.4421 Cell 310.739.5966 wenli.wang@otis.com This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information of Otis= Elevator Company, a part of UTC Building & Industrial Systems, a unit of U= nited Technologies Corp. and its affiliated companies. If you are not the = intended recipient please 1) do not disclose, copy, distribute or use this = information, 2) advise the sender by return e-mail and 3) delete all copies= from your computer. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. This e-mail may also contain or have attached to it information or technolo= gy the export or re-export of which is restricted by U.S. laws and regulati= ons. By viewing this e-mail and any attachments, the recipient agrees to th= e following: (i) the recipient=92s use of the contents of this e-mail and a= ny attachments shall comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations= , including, without limitation, U.S. international trade laws and regulati= ons, and (ii) the recipient may not transfer or otherwise export or re-expo= rt any information or technology contained in this e-mail or any attachment= except in full compliance with the export controls administered by the U.S= . and other countries and any applicable import and use restrictions --_000_FAB9A3DF29CF3D4789B5405D093ED96A2525EF2AUUSNWE1Qnautcma_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Simon,

Thanks for coming to Otis Server Center to conduct C= ompass Security Integration Runoff test. In general, it was a good test, and I = am glad that your system implemented all features except CIM, with solid pe= rformance.

The follow summarized the test results:

1. Standard interface testing, include

a. Otis DES and local DEC configuration, and passed al= l test cases.

b. DEC operation mode setup, and passed all test cases= .

c. PIN code and Audit Record support, and pass the all= test cases except enable/disable Audit record. This is not critical if you= r system can enable audit record automatically.

d. Special feature settings (TD bits), and passed all = test cases. Note: special features associated= with TD Bits are configurable from Elevator system. For example, TD08 =3D = vertigo by default, but it could be configured as different TD bit.

e. Multiple server group support =96 passed all test c= ases.

f. DER and global DECs = =96 configuration of DER is not explicitly from UI, but automatically when conf= igure global DECs. This is ok when DER servers use the default IP addresses of 10 and 2= 0 (most cases). However, there are some special cases when DE= R servers will use different IP addresses, such as 30 & 40.

g. System recovery from communication error =96 passed.

h. System recovery from compass server failover =96 passed.

i. The following interface/features were not tested:

i. V1 interface =96 not support.

ii. CIM segment=96 not support.

2. Card data handling for ICD v3 support.

a. Receive and process security card data from Otis re= ader =96 passed. We tested with a standard 26 bit HID P= rox card.

3. Tested the system with both Otis internal readers a= nd BluB0x external readers on one compass system =96 passed.

Please feel free to provide your input/feedback.

Thanks,

Wenli Wang<= /o:p>

Software Enginee= ring Group

Otis Service Cen= ter

212 West Newberr= y Road, Bloomfield CT 06002

Phone 860.286.44= 21 Cell 310.739.5966

wenli.wang@otis.com

This message may contain confidential and/or privil= eged information of Otis Elevator Company, a part of UTC Building & Ind= ustrial Systems, a unit of United Technologies Corp. and its affiliated companies. If you are not the intended recipient = please 1) do not disclose, copy, distribute or use this information, 2) adv= ise the sender by return e-mail and 3) delete all copies from your computer= . Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

This e= -mail may also contain or have attached to it information or technology the= export or re-export of which is restricted by U.S. laws and regulations. B= y viewing this e-mail and any attachments, the recipient agrees to the following: (i) the recipient=92s use of the co= ntents of this e-mail and any attachments shall comply with all applicable = laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, U.S. internatio= nal trade laws and regulations, and (ii) the recipient may not transfer or otherwise export or re-export any i= nformation or technology contained in this e-mail or any attachment except = in full compliance with the export controls administered by the U.S. and ot= her countries and any applicable import and use restrictions

--_000_FAB9A3DF29CF3D4789B5405D093ED96A2525EF2AUUSNWE1Qnautcma_--